Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Rising star, rising farce

In the 18 year history of the AFL’s Rising Star Award there’s been just three winners who’ve ranked among the top two rookies for both disposals and tackling throughout the course of a season; Paul Hasleby in 2000, Sam Mitchell in 2003, Joel Selwood in 2007.

Those three were not only deemed the competition's best first year player in their respective seasons, but demonstrated an incredible ability to both gain possession and to do everything in their power to get it back. In short, the perfect combination of midfield attack and defence.

In season 2011 the Bulldogs’ Tom Liberatore is only the fourth rookie in nearly twenty years to qualify for this elite category. He’s ranked second amongst rookie players for possessions (20) and second amongst rookies for tackles (6). He’s first among his peers for average Supercoach score (91), first for goals assists (5) and is ranked in the league's top 10 for driving the ball inside his team’s forward 50 arc (18).

Yet after eight completed rounds of football Libba’s still waiting on a call to even be nominated for the prestigious award, let only be installed as favourite.

Of the eight players to have so far received nominations only Essendon's Dyson Heppell is among his own club's top ten for both disposals and tackles. At the Bulldogs there’s just seven players averaging more disposals than Liberatore, while not one has performed better where tackling is concerned.

Consider for a moment the league's most recent Rising Star nominee, Hawthorn’s Shane Savage. A good young player to be sure, but one who at the same time is ranked just 17th amongst first year players for possessions and just 25th for tackles. His numbers paint a similar picture when put into the context of his own club’s playing list. An excellent contributer,yes. An indisputably integral part of the Hawks? Hardly.

In Liberatore’s case to have a player come in and be so effective, so immediately has been remarkable. Add to that the reputation of entering the competition as an 18 year old son of a former Brownlow Medallist, coupled with the intense competition for a place in the Bulldog midfield, and his achievements are even more impressive.

To still be waiting for a Rising Star nomination after two months of football is truly scandalous.

Tom Liberatore, like his father, isn’t the type who seems concerned by how the external football world perceives him but rather more so by how his on-field efforts are measured by his teammates and coaching staff. However like any professional doing a damn good job, a little industry appreciation wouldn’t be such a bad thing.

It really is about time he received some.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

The Victory's New Manager-Avoiding The Easy Option

On the Saturday before the A-League’s unforgettable Grand Final in March which punctuated perhaps the very best season in Australian domestic soccer history, the new Melbourne Victory board chose to announce the sacking of Ernie Merrick.

It was a self-centred and arrogant move from the newly installed board intent on having their voice heard, at a time when the attention should have been focused on Brisbane.

Whether right or wrong, the dismissal of Merrick could have waited a few more days.

Merrick’s sacking was handled deplorably. Truth be told it was botched. The Anthony Di Pietro-led board portrayed it as a mutual decision when it obviously wasn’t. Weeks later long time football manager Gary Cole along with Merrick’s assistant Aaron Healy were axed in similar circumstances.

For Di Pietro and the board, the Victory’s undeniable successes and the people who made it possible were yesterday’s news and were dealt with accordingly.

Youth team coach Mehmet Durakovic was soon installed as interterm coach to see out the remainder of the club’s Asian Champions League campaign and to hopefully spare the club from further embarrassment. As for the board, we’ve heard very little. No statement to the media regarding the club’s direction or philosophy, nothing for the fans either.

If the new board were playing the game they’d already be a couple of goals down within the first few minutes of the match.

What we do know is that as many as 70 candidates have apparently applied for the Victory job with both local and international submissions. There’s been no publicised short list, nor a specific criteria as to the type of manager the board wants. Rather just an assurance that the position is highly coveted which is hardly something we didn’t already know. The tight lipped approach has inevitably resulted in a rumour circus which will only get worse the longer the process takes.

Following the Victory’s elimination from the ACL on Wednesday night, calls for the process of hiring a new manager for the A-League’s most successful club will get louder, while the temptation to keep Durakovic will be strong. He’s had plenty of media goodwill in recent times while as suggested he's done a reasonable job as interterm coach through a difficult time.

With that said hiring Durakovic as manager would also be the easiest and cheapest option for the club and it’s something that should be avoided.

There really is a lot to like about Mehmet Durakovic. As a player, he was an undersized central defender with a strange name who forged a decent international career as well as working his way to the very centre of the Socceroo defence in the 90's. As a coach he’s charismatic and laid back, comfortable with the media and seems to have an excellent rapport with the players. He seems passionate about the Victory and hasn’t shied away from declaring his hand for the job on a full time basis.

Unfortunately, however, nothing really changed in the five ACL matches he was at the helm.

The Victory finished bottom of their ACL group and continued to concede inexcusable goals which reeked of a lack of training ground application. Despite the buoyancy in and around the camp Durakovic seemed no more astute than Merrick in regards to the vagaries of continental football, whilst very little changed in regards the composition of the team or in regards to consistently playing any of the Victory’s promising youth players.

If Durakovic did anything during his five ACL games worthy of securing the job in the face of some supposedly excellent candidates, then I missed it.

There’s no doubt Durakovic’s time as a head coach at a higher level will come however that time isn’t now and the club isn’t Melbourne. He’s served an invaluable apprenticeship in a vital competition and at a difficult time for the club. He injected some real pep into a team whose confidence was shot to pieces yet he’s neither performed any miracles let alone save the club from yet another Asian embarrassment.

The new board has struggled in its early stages, quite badly to be honest, however unlike the team’s ACL campaign, their hard work isn’t nearly over. They’ve a huge decision to make in the coming weeks that really needs to be handled a lot better than the Merrick dismissal which got us here in the first place. The easy option must be avoided.